This week brings the first College Football Champion Index™ head-to-head comparison with the BCS Poll and introduces a modified CFCI Ranking System. An explanation of the CFCI Original Ranking is found in the links below with the key to understanding it being that all teams are treated equally in the CFCI Original Ranking and that it’s designed to work itself out over the course of a season. Currently the CFCI Original Rankings include 19 of the AP Top 25 Poll with five of the six different schools (Arkansas, Nebraska, Texas A&M, Georgia, and Arizona St.) looming between 26 and 35 in the CFCI Original. Although having only one loss, the Arkansas Razorbacks are the biggest difference between the CFCI and either the AP Top 25 or the BCS. In large part Arkansas’s statistical defensive performances are to blame in addition to losing some ground because of an off week in the categories which consider performances over the course of a season. As against the BCS, the CFCI Original includes 20 of the 25 same schools. Both the CFCI and BCS include Penn St. which is omitted from the AP Top 25 Poll. Three of the five differences between the two are found in schools ranked 26 through 35 in the CFCI Original (Arkansas, Georgia and Texas A&M), but expanded CFCI rankings don’t include either Texas or Auburn. Both schools have two losses while Texas’ defensive rankings were pummeled over the last two weeks by the collective 93 points racked up by Oklahoma and Oklahoma St. Auburn suffers on both sides of the ball from giving up more than 34 points in 3 games this year while scoring no more than 17 points in 3 games this season.
Head-to-Head between Alabama and LSU, the Tide hold slight advantages statistically in the Passing First Downs component of Total First Downs by Season, Pass Efficiency Defense, Scoring Offense, Sacks by Season, and Passing Offense. LSU holds small advantages over Alabama in Passing Efficiency Offense and Turnover Margin. The overall difference after every category is measured is only fourteen-thousandths of a point. The difference in the opinion polls likely comes from LSU’s victories over 4 Top 25 teams as opposed to Alabama’s 3.
College Football Champion Index Original™ Week 7
Performance Rank | CFCI Week 7 | Performance | Elimination | Elimination Rank |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Alabama | 0.970 | 0.970 | 1 |
2 | LSU | 0.956 | 0.956 | 2 |
3 | Wisconsin | 0.948 | 0.948 | 3 |
4 | Boise St. | 0.936 | 0.936 | 4 |
6 | Stanford | 0.925 | 0.925 | 5 |
7 | Oklahoma | 0.922 | 0.922 | 6 |
11 | Clemson | 0.871 | 0.871 | 7 |
18 | Houston | 0.856 | 0.856 | 8 |
28 | Oklahoma St. | 0.832 | 0.832 | 9 |
31 | Kansas St. | 0.826 | 0.826 | 10 |
5 | Cincinnati | 0.931 | 0.621 | 11 |
9 | Virginia Tech | 0.910 | 0.607 | 12 |
10 | Illinois | 0.893 | 0.595 | 13 |
12 | Michigan St. | 0.870 | 0.580 | 14 |
15 | Penn St. | 0.861 | 0.574 | 15 |
22 | Oregon | 0.853 | 0.569 | 16 |
23 | Michigan | 0.853 | 0.569 | 17 |
24 | South Carolina | 0.850 | 0.567 | 18 |
26 | Georgia Tech | 0.848 | 0.565 | 19 |
27 | Southern Miss. | 0.835 | 0.556 | 20 |
34 | Washington | 0.819 | 0.546 | 21 |
38 | West Virginia | 0.810 | 0.540 | 22 |
41 | Rutgers | 0.807 | 0.538 | 23 |
56 | La.-Lafayette | 0.771 | 0.514 | 24 |
57 | SMU | 0.769 | 0.513 | 25 |
62 | Nebraska | 0.763 | 0.509 | 26 |
66 | Arkansas | 0.759 | 0.506 | 27 |
8 | Temple | 0.920 | 0.460 | 28 |
13 | South Fla. | 0.866 | 0.433 | 29 |
17 | TCU | 0.856 | 0.428 | 30 |
19 | Georgia | 0.855 | 0.428 | 31 |
20 | Texas A&M | 0.855 | 0.427 | 32 |
29 | North Carolina | 0.828 | 0.414 | 33 |
33 | Notre Dame | 0.824 | 0.412 | 34 |
35 | Arizona St. | 0.819 | 0.409 | 35 |
42 | Baylor | 0.806 | 0.403 | 36 |
43 | FIU | 0.805 | 0.403 | 37 |
44 | Arkansas St. | 0.802 | 0.401 | 38 |
45 | Texas Tech | 0.796 | 0.398 | 39 |
46 | Iowa | 0.796 | 0.398 | 40 |
54 | Texas | 0.774 | 0.387 | 41 |
55 | Virginia | 0.771 | 0.386 | 42 |
63 | San Diego St. | 0.762 | 0.381 | 43 |
67 | Wyoming | 0.757 | 0.379 | 44 |
70 | Wake Forest | 0.756 | 0.378 | 45 |
72 | Auburn | 0.755 | 0.377 | 46 |
76 | Syracuse | 0.734 | 0.367 | 47 |
78 | BYU | 0.718 | 0.359 | 48 |
14 | Missouri | 0.865 | 0.346 | 49 |
16 | UCF | 0.858 | 0.343 | 50 |
21 | Ohio | 0.854 | 0.341 | 51 |
25 | Florida St. | 0.849 | 0.339 | 52 |
32 | Toledo | 0.825 | 0.330 | 53 |
36 | Ohio St. | 0.816 | 0.326 | 54 |
37 | Air Force | 0.813 | 0.325 | 55 |
40 | Northern Ill. | 0.808 | 0.323 | 56 |
47 | Utah | 0.782 | 0.313 | 57 |
48 | Miami (FL) | 0.782 | 0.313 | 58 |
50 | Hawaii | 0.778 | 0.311 | 59 |
52 | Purdue | 0.776 | 0.311 | 60 |
53 | Florida | 0.776 | 0.310 | 61 |
58 | Washington St. | 0.768 | 0.307 | 62 |
59 | North Carolina St. | 0.768 | 0.307 | 63 |
60 | Nevada | 0.767 | 0.307 | 64 |
61 | California | 0.764 | 0.306 | 65 |
68 | Tennessee | 0.756 | 0.303 | 66 |
69 | Western Mich. | 0.756 | 0.303 | 67 |
79 | New Mexico St. | 0.718 | 0.287 | 68 |
83 | Tulsa | 0.708 | 0.283 | 69 |
87 | Eastern Mich. | 0.695 | 0.278 | 70 |
88 | Ball St. | 0.690 | 0.276 | 71 |
91 | Colorado St. | 0.681 | 0.272 | 72 |
92 | UTEP | 0.680 | 0.272 | 73 |
93 | Duke | 0.679 | 0.271 | 74 |
39 | Mississippi St. | 0.809 | 0.270 | 75 |
96 | Vanderbilt | 0.673 | 0.269 | 76 |
101 | UCLA | 0.662 | 0.265 | 77 |
49 | Northwestern | 0.779 | 0.260 | 78 |
51 | Connecticut | 0.778 | 0.259 | 79 |
109 | Iowa St. | 0.634 | 0.254 | 80 |
64 | Louisville | 0.761 | 0.254 | 81 |
65 | Pittsburgh | 0.759 | 0.253 | 82 |
71 | Bowling Green | 0.756 | 0.252 | 83 |
73 | Louisiana Tech | 0.752 | 0.251 | 84 |
74 | Maryland | 0.736 | 0.245 | 85 |
75 | La.-Monroe | 0.734 | 0.245 | 86 |
77 | Navy | 0.724 | 0.241 | 87 |
80 | Kansas | 0.715 | 0.238 | 88 |
81 | Utah St. | 0.714 | 0.238 | 89 |
82 | Middle Tenn. | 0.710 | 0.237 | 90 |
84 | Fresno St. | 0.701 | 0.234 | 91 |
85 | Army | 0.699 | 0.233 | 92 |
95 | Rice | 0.674 | 0.225 | 93 |
97 | Marshall | 0.670 | 0.223 | 94 |
98 | San Jose St. | 0.668 | 0.223 | 95 |
99 | Miami (OH) | 0.665 | 0.222 | 96 |
102 | Western Ky. | 0.661 | 0.220 | 97 |
106 | Troy | 0.651 | 0.217 | 98 |
107 | East Carolina | 0.650 | 0.217 | 99 |
111 | Ole Miss | 0.600 | 0.200 | 100 |
86 | Tulane | 0.696 | 0.199 | 101 |
89 | North Texas | 0.688 | 0.196 | 102 |
94 | Buffalo | 0.675 | 0.193 | 103 |
100 | Oregon St. | 0.663 | 0.190 | 104 |
104 | Boston College | 0.657 | 0.188 | 105 |
105 | Arizona | 0.654 | 0.187 | 106 |
120 | Kentucky | 0.549 | 0.183 | 107 |
108 | Central Mich. | 0.641 | 0.183 | 108 |
90 | Colorado | 0.686 | 0.171 | 109 |
113 | Minnesota | 0.591 | 0.169 | 110 |
103 | Indiana | 0.658 | 0.165 | 111 |
117 | Akron | 0.562 | 0.161 | 112 |
118 | UNLV | 0.558 | 0.159 | 113 |
110 | Memphis | 0.603 | 0.151 | 114 |
112 | New Mexico | 0.595 | 0.149 | 115 |
114 | Idaho | 0.581 | 0.145 | 116 |
115 | Kent St. | 0.569 | 0.142 | 117 |
116 | Fla. Atlantic | 0.563 | 0.141 | 118 |
119 | UAB | 0.557 | 0.139 | 119 |
30 | Southern California | 0.827 | 0.000 | 120 |
Sort as You Like.
*University of Southern California is Banned from post-season play through 2011 and is automatically eliminated from contention.
In working with modifications to the CFCI, two things became evident. The first was that losses by some schools are treated worse than losses by others whether one looks at the AP Top 25 or the BCS Poll. It should be noted for those who don’t know that the AP Top 25 is not included in the BCS computation. The second issue is illustrated by Louisiana-Lafayette in the CFCI Original. Although it may work out over the course of the season, the Rajun Cajuns’ sole loss this season is to Oklahoma State by a score of 61-34. Through Week 7 the highest ranked CFCI opponent in the Elimination Index that La-Lafayette has beaten has been 98th ranked Troy. It makes little football common sense to place the Rajun Cajuns among the elite.
Believing that the CFCI has much going for it already, without the benefit of study (which will take some time) the logical way of tweaking the system was to take the observations above and see if they might be made to approximate the AP Top 25 and BCS Poll when the same math was applied to similarly-situated schools. In some manner it would bring human evaluation into the CFCI, and yes, it might be fairly said that the numbers are being manipulated within a framework to produce a result.
The easiest and first choice was to recognize and account for the difference between BCS and non-BCS Conference Schools when they lose. Adjustments were made by adding a slightly greater impact on the Elimination Index when non-BCS Conference team loses. But the change didn’t make a tremendous difference and specifically didn’t take a team like the Houston Cougars into account. At 6-0, Houston is worthy of some recognition but with the Cougars’ best victory over a CFCI 77th ranked UCLA, keying on losses wouldn’t make any fair adjustment.
The difference between BCS and non-BCS conferences was once again played upon. The idea here was to discount the Performance Score without making the hurdle insurmountable for a non-BCS Conference school. Two exceptions were made for schools who have cracked the BCS barrier recently and who are treated differently as is done in the real world. Neither Boise State nor TCU were tagged with the non-BCS reduction in Performance Scores. For Boise, its performance scores are great enough that it wouldn’t keep the school out of the CFCI’s Top 10 even if a reduction was applied. TCU has two losses and the losses alone would bring them down the list with or without a reduction in performance values.
Even applying those changes the net result didn’t change by much the number of CFCI-ranked teams in either the AP Top 25 or the BCS Polls. In other words, despite blatant changes applied across categories of teams, as long as all BCS Conference teams, with two noted exceptions, were treated the same, all the changes did to some extent was to substitute out one set of teams for another set of non-AP Top 25 or non-BCS Ranked teams. The sticking points came in the system’s evaluation of one-loss ACC and Big East teams. With BCS Conference teams such as Clemson, poll voters don’t appear to care that Clemson is in the ACC as long as it remains undefeated. For the CFCI, if a team doesn’t lose, its Performance Score is the same as its Elimination Score. One-loss ACC and Big East Teams, Georgia Tech and Virginia Tech in the ACC and Rutgers, Cincinnati and West Virginia in the Big East, collectively fair no better in either the AP or BCS Polls than a No. 11 West Virginia ranking while Rutgers and Cincinnati are in neither poll.
Please pardon the long path to the imperfect solution, but it’s a point worth noting. When Elimination Scores (i.e. accounting for losses) were calculated exactly the same way for ACC, Big East, and non-BCS Conference schools, the result is the Index below which more closely approximates the AP Top 25 and BCS Polls. With the tweaks as described, the CFCI Modified Index includes 23 of the 25 AP Top 25 Poll teams and 22 of the 25 BCS Poll Teams. In the end, non-BCS Conference Teams’ performances were were discounted and losses of non-BCS, ACC, and Big East Teams are slightly more harsh than for non-BCS teams. The results are some indication of how poll voters are behaving collectively regardless of whether they actually believe they are making those evaluations.
In the end, the CFCI Original Index is expected to include somewhere around 20-22 of the BCS and AP Top 25 Polls without the modifications.
College Football Champion Index Modified™ 7
Performance Rank | Modified CFCI Week 7 | Performance | Elimination | Elimination Rank |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Alabama | 0.970 | 0.970 | 1 |
2 | LSU | 0.956 | 0.956 | 2 |
3 | Wisconsin | 0.948 | 0.948 | 3 |
4 | Boise St. | 0.936 | 0.936 | 4 |
6 | Stanford | 0.925 | 0.925 | 5 |
7 | Oklahoma | 0.922 | 0.922 | 6 |
10 | Clemson | 0.871 | 0.871 | 7 |
23 | Oklahoma St. | 0.832 | 0.832 | 8 |
26 | Kansas St. | 0.826 | 0.826 | 9 |
59 | Houston | 0.728 | 0.728 | 10 |
9 | Illinois | 0.893 | 0.714 | 11 |
11 | Michigan St. | 0.870 | 0.696 | 12 |
14 | Penn St. | 0.861 | 0.689 | 13 |
18 | Oregon | 0.853 | 0.683 | 14 |
19 | Michigan | 0.853 | 0.683 | 15 |
20 | South Carolina | 0.850 | 0.680 | 16 |
28 | Washington | 0.819 | 0.655 | 17 |
5 | Cincinnati | 0.931 | 0.621 | 18 |
49 | Nebraska | 0.763 | 0.611 | 19 |
52 | Arkansas | 0.759 | 0.607 | 20 |
8 | Virginia Tech | 0.910 | 0.607 | 21 |
16 | Georgia | 0.855 | 0.570 | 22 |
17 | Texas A&M | 0.855 | 0.570 | 22 |
22 | Georgia Tech | 0.848 | 0.565 | 24 |
29 | Arizona St. | 0.819 | 0.546 | 25 |
31 | West Virginia | 0.810 | 0.540 | 26 |
33 | Rutgers | 0.807 | 0.538 | 27 |
34 | Baylor | 0.806 | 0.537 | 28 |
35 | Texas Tech | 0.796 | 0.531 | 29 |
36 | Iowa | 0.796 | 0.531 | 30 |
44 | Texas | 0.774 | 0.516 | 31 |
55 | Auburn | 0.755 | 0.503 | 32 |
13 | Missouri | 0.865 | 0.494 | 33 |
62 | Southern Miss. | 0.709 | 0.473 | 34 |
30 | Ohio St. | 0.816 | 0.466 | 35 |
37 | Utah | 0.782 | 0.447 | 36 |
42 | Purdue | 0.776 | 0.444 | 37 |
43 | Florida | 0.776 | 0.443 | 38 |
46 | Washington St. | 0.768 | 0.439 | 39 |
76 | La.-Lafayette | 0.655 | 0.437 | 40 |
48 | California | 0.764 | 0.437 | 41 |
78 | SMU | 0.653 | 0.436 | 42 |
12 | South Fla. | 0.866 | 0.433 | 43 |
53 | Tennessee | 0.756 | 0.432 | 44 |
15 | TCU | 0.856 | 0.428 | 45 |
24 | North Carolina | 0.828 | 0.414 | 46 |
27 | Notre Dame | 0.824 | 0.412 | 47 |
32 | Mississippi St. | 0.809 | 0.405 | 48 |
39 | Temple | 0.782 | 0.391 | 49 |
40 | Northwestern | 0.779 | 0.390 | 50 |
45 | Virginia | 0.771 | 0.386 | 51 |
70 | Vanderbilt | 0.673 | 0.385 | 52 |
72 | UCLA | 0.662 | 0.379 | 53 |
54 | Wake Forest | 0.756 | 0.378 | 54 |
57 | Syracuse | 0.734 | 0.367 | 55 |
85 | Iowa St. | 0.634 | 0.362 | 56 |
61 | Kansas | 0.715 | 0.357 | 57 |
67 | FIU | 0.685 | 0.342 | 58 |
68 | Arkansas St. | 0.682 | 0.341 | 59 |
21 | Florida St. | 0.849 | 0.339 | 60 |
80 | San Diego St. | 0.647 | 0.324 | 61 |
81 | Wyoming | 0.644 | 0.322 | 62 |
38 | Miami (FL) | 0.782 | 0.313 | 63 |
47 | North Carolina St. | 0.768 | 0.307 | 64 |
88 | BYU | 0.611 | 0.305 | 65 |
93 | Ole Miss | 0.600 | 0.300 | 66 |
71 | Oregon St. | 0.663 | 0.295 | 67 |
58 | UCF | 0.730 | 0.292 | 68 |
77 | Arizona | 0.654 | 0.290 | 69 |
60 | Ohio | 0.726 | 0.290 | 70 |
63 | Toledo | 0.701 | 0.280 | 71 |
64 | Air Force | 0.691 | 0.277 | 72 |
111 | Kentucky | 0.549 | 0.275 | 73 |
65 | Northern Ill. | 0.686 | 0.275 | 74 |
66 | Colorado | 0.686 | 0.274 | 75 |
69 | Duke | 0.679 | 0.271 | 76 |
73 | Hawaii | 0.662 | 0.265 | 77 |
74 | Indiana | 0.658 | 0.263 | 78 |
97 | Minnesota | 0.591 | 0.263 | 79 |
79 | Nevada | 0.652 | 0.261 | 80 |
41 | Connecticut | 0.778 | 0.259 | 81 |
82 | Western Mich. | 0.643 | 0.257 | 82 |
50 | Louisville | 0.761 | 0.254 | 83 |
51 | Pittsburgh | 0.759 | 0.253 | 84 |
56 | Maryland | 0.736 | 0.245 | 85 |
89 | New Mexico St. | 0.611 | 0.244 | 86 |
92 | Tulsa | 0.602 | 0.241 | 87 |
98 | Eastern Mich. | 0.590 | 0.236 | 88 |
99 | Ball St. | 0.587 | 0.235 | 89 |
101 | Colorado St. | 0.579 | 0.231 | 90 |
102 | UTEP | 0.578 | 0.231 | 91 |
83 | Bowling Green | 0.642 | 0.214 | 92 |
84 | Louisiana Tech | 0.639 | 0.213 | 93 |
86 | La.-Monroe | 0.624 | 0.208 | 94 |
87 | Navy | 0.616 | 0.205 | 95 |
90 | Utah St. | 0.607 | 0.202 | 96 |
91 | Middle Tenn. | 0.603 | 0.201 | 97 |
94 | Fresno St. | 0.596 | 0.199 | 98 |
95 | Army | 0.594 | 0.198 | 99 |
104 | Rice | 0.573 | 0.191 | 100 |
105 | Marshall | 0.570 | 0.190 | 101 |
106 | San Jose St. | 0.568 | 0.189 | 102 |
107 | Miami (OH) | 0.565 | 0.188 | 103 |
75 | Boston College | 0.657 | 0.188 | 104 |
108 | Western Ky. | 0.562 | 0.187 | 105 |
109 | Troy | 0.554 | 0.185 | 106 |
110 | East Carolina | 0.553 | 0.184 | 107 |
96 | Tulane | 0.592 | 0.169 | 108 |
100 | North Texas | 0.584 | 0.167 | 109 |
103 | Buffalo | 0.574 | 0.164 | 110 |
112 | Central Mich. | 0.544 | 0.156 | 111 |
118 | Akron | 0.478 | 0.137 | 112 |
119 | UNLV | 0.474 | 0.136 | 113 |
113 | Memphis | 0.512 | 0.128 | 114 |
114 | New Mexico | 0.505 | 0.126 | 115 |
115 | Idaho | 0.494 | 0.124 | 116 |
116 | Kent St. | 0.484 | 0.121 | 117 |
117 | Fla. Atlantic | 0.478 | 0.120 | 118 |
120 | UAB | 0.473 | 0.118 | 119 |
25 | Southern California | 0.827 | 0.000 | 120 |
Sort as You Like.
*University of Southern California is Banned from post-season play through 2011 and is automatically eliminated from contention.
CFCI v. AP Top 25 v. BCS Poll
CFCI Orig. Rk. | CFCI Original | CFCI Mod. Rk. | CFCI Modified | AP Top 25 Rk. | AP Top 25 | BCS Rk. | BCS Poll |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Alabama | 1 | Alabama | 1 | LSU | 1 | LSU |
2 | LSU | 2 | LSU | 2 | Alabama | 2 | Alabama |
3 | Wisconsin | 3 | Wisconsin | 3 | Oklahoma | 3 | Oklahoma |
4 | Boise St. | 4 | Boise St. | 4 | Wisconsin | 4 | Oklahoma St. |
5 | Stanford | 5 | Stanford | 5 | Boise State | 5 | Boise State |
6 | Oklahoma | 6 | Oklahoma | 6 | Oklahoma St. | 6 | Wisconsin |
7 | Clemson | 7 | Clemson | 7 | Stanford | 7 | Clemson |
8 | Houston | 8 | Oklahoma St. | 8 | Clemson | 8 | Stanford |
9 | Oklahoma St. | 9 | Kansas St. | 9 | Oregon | 9 | Arkansas |
10 | Kansas St. | 10 | Houston | 10 | Arkansas | 10 | Oregon |
11 | Cincinnati | 11 | Illinois | 11 | West Virginia | 11 | Kansas St. |
12 | Virginia Tech | 12 | Michigan St. | 12 | Kansas St. | 12 | Virginia Tech |
13 | Illinois | 13 | Penn St. | 13 | Nebraska | 13 | Nebraska |
14 | Michigan St. | 14 | Oregon | 14 | South Carolina | 14 | South Carolina |
15 | Penn St. | 14 | Michigan | 15 | Michigan St. | 15 | West Virginia |
16 | Oregon | 16 | South Carolina | 16 | Virginia Tech | 16 | Michigan St. |
16 | Michigan | 17 | Washington | 17 | Texas A&M | 17 | Texas A&M |
18 | South Carolina | 18 | Cincinnati | 18 | Michigan | 18 | Michigan |
19 | Georgia Tech | 19 | Nebraska | 19 | Auburn | 19 | Houston |
20 | Southern Miss. | 20 | Arkansas | 20 | Georgia Tech | 20 | Auburn |
21 | Washington | 21 | Virginia Tech | 21 | Houston | 21 | Penn State |
22 | West Virginia | 22 | Georgia | 22 | Washington | 22 | Georgia Tech |
23 | Rutgers | 23 | Texas A&M | 23 | Illinois | 23 | Illinois |
24 | La.-Lafayette | 24 | Georgia Tech | 24 | Georgia | 24 | Texas |
25 | SMU | 25 | Arizona St. | 25 | Arizona State | 25 | Washington |
Sort as You Like.
*University of Southern California is Banned from post-season play through 2011 and is automatically eliminated from contention.
College Football Championship Index Prior Weeks
Unable to do Week 6.